TWG3 Game over

I'm also going to hold my vote for a while, I just need to mull it over a little.  In the meantime, I'm just going to lay out some thoughts and see where I (and my fellow village dwellers) land on them in the coming hours.

We already know that we are hunting more than two wolves, and, well, Kermits suspect list above seems to be pointing fingers all over - with the exception of Beaker and Cookie Monster.  If this is a genuine trifecta of wolves then we villagers will need to strike hard and fast because that is a very intimidating line-up!!  It's also not unlikely that one of these guys is being framed, and there is another fiend hiding in the shadows getting an initiate wolfy education.

So I look at each to see if any are less suspicious than the others:

Cookie Monster - had many votes cast against him (and in fact was nearly voted off!) and by more than one who 'did not give cookie'.  Now I have a vote against me, cast by the Cookie Monster, and what did I do to deserve that??  I took a stab at a vote on the first night, then called him out as a potential wolf the next day.  hmmm

Beaker - obviously made the cut on my list mostly because of Kermits reasoning above - but on reading your reply to my notion of wolves taking a bye in exchange for a certain vote - I feel like your response was exactly what i would have done as a werewolf    lots of talk about how it's been disruptive for the villagers, and how it only plays to werewolf advantage to the point where i honestly thought you were going to suggest we simply ignore him, and vote accordingly.  But nope, in conclusion - you volunteered to vote off the innocent.  That silver tongue of yours must burn come nightfall!!  dohohohoho

Kermit -  I mean c'mon!  So much of your gameplay to now has been wolfish in appearance !!  Your vote for Statler was expected  (hehehe)  but your move to change your mind to TIE a vote and save Cookie Monster just doesn't ring true.  Had your done it to UNTIE it I probably wouldn't have looked at it too hard at all!  Which makes me wonder - was it to cover a fellow wolf, or to frame a villager to protect someone else in the event of your demise??

The simple fact is - I'm torn, and need to process.  I'll be back later to make my decision.  Hopefully sort some tripe from the treasure!

GONZO IS P****D OFF

SPENT AGES WRITING MY POST USING MY SPECIAL CONDITIONS HIT REPLY AND MY F***WIT COMPUTER LOADED A PAGE WITH YOU NEED TO UPDATE BLAH BLAH BLAH (WHICH IT WILL TRY TO DOWNLOAD UNSUCCESSFULLY I MIGHT ADD) AND EVERYTIME I TRY TO COME BACK TO FORUM IT JUMPED BACK TO MESSAGE
I AM NOT HAPPY
I WILL RETURN AND TRY AGAIN WHEN THE URGE TO THROW THIS PIECE OF S**T OUT THE WINDOW HAS DISAPATED

dictionary.reference.com/browse/dissipated?s=t<----- swear filter and spell check by Tiger    


Don't worry it's free of charge!


Love and hugs x x x x  

thanks tiger i put soo much work into mypost and JUST as i clicked to post its wiped out i could have cried will do a bit before i go work for my vote but it will be crap 

Ok first of all waldorf a May have violant tendonitis but that is caused by all the bacon sarnie lovers around me !! we'll done to are fantastic gonzo stuntman extraordinaire good effort but you will never be a bigger star than moi(said dramatically)my vote is going to count Dracula as they shake to May similarities wit the wolves makes sense doesn't it

Just wanted to say I'm finding it very difficult to heckle the last few sketches....I loved near and far by Super Grover and Gonzo's act was also brilliant


I f you were wondering why I haven't checked in before now - like Gonzo I've been having computer trouble! see clip to clarify!



So... what to do? The trouble is - it's harder due the distraction / drama as cockroach said! So there's little to go on and no doubt the wolves were loving it as it took attention away from them. I'm thinking despite this - bearing in mind the new players - that there has got to be at least one experienced wolf in the mix, who is coaching? perhaps the others in wolf skills like the old "wolf in sheep's clothing" trick, which is perhaps (drama aside) the best reason I can come up with, that we have little or to be honest - absolutely nothing to go on.

That means the villagers need to look closely at the following 4 people: Kermit, Beaker, Esperare and Meustrus.

After his last post - if Meustrus was guilty then I think maybe the game would have been stopped as it would have made too much of a mess of things - although saying that if a silver bullet was used then the remaining wolves could just sacrifice him then and there would be no problem - so it's possible he's the experienced wolf but I'm thinking it's less likely to be him than one of the other 3 in the circumstances.

My gut instinct tells me the experienced wolf is either kermit or Beaker. I think you'll find that one of them is a wolf. The question is - which one, and I could write an essay on all the reasons for and against in each case, but ultimately - I'm just not sure. The problem is- if you vote off the innocent one first then your search for the remaining wolves will be harder without them to help you.

As to the rest of the wolves - I have no idea, but you'll have a much better chance of tripping them up once you've taken their coach out of the equation.

Since I'm likely to get killed off tonight I'll bid you goodnight and good luck all and hope you catch the wolves!